|
FIRE Amended Legislation
Report Date: 6/4/2007
|
|
|
|
AB 81
|
(Torrico) Child protection: safe
surrender. (A-06/01/2007Â htmlÂ
pdf)
|
|
Status:06/01/2007-From
committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 31). Read
second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
|
|
Current Location:06/01/2007-A
SECOND READING
|
|
Calendar Events:06/04/07
11 ASM SECOND READING FILE
|
|
Â
|
|
Summary:
|
Existing law designates certain locations as
safe-surrender sites for the safe surrender of newborn children who are 72
hours of age or younger. This bill would expand the scope of those
provisions to apply to children who are 30 days old or younger. The bill
would permit a local fire agency, upon the approval of the appropriate
local governing body of the agency, to designate a safe-surrender site. The
bill would specify certain circumstances in which a safe-surrender site and
its personnel have no liability for a surrendered child. This bill contains
other related provisions and other existing laws.
|
|
Â
|
|
|
|
Organization
|
Assigned
|
Position
|
Priority
|
Subject
|
Groups
|
|
FIRE
|
RHeim
|
Support
|
|
|
|
|
Â
|
|
|
|
|
AB 124
|
(Price) Meal and rest periods.
(A-06/01/2007Â htmlÂ
pdf)
|
|
Status:06/01/2007-From
committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 31). Read
second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
|
|
Current Location:06/01/2007-A
SECOND READING
|
|
Calendar Events:06/04/07
183 ASM SECOND READING FILE
|
|
Â
|
|
Summary:
|
Existing law authorizes the Industrial Welfare
Commission to adopt orders respecting wages, hours, and working conditions.
This bill would extend the protections afforded to employees covered by an
order of the commission to pool lifeguards and stage assistants who are
employed by the state or any political subdivision thereof , to the extent
not in conflict with the provisions of a memorandum of understanding
reached between an employer and a recognized employee organization, as
specified . This bill contains other existing laws.
|
|
Â
|
|
|
|
Organization
|
Assigned
|
Position
|
Priority
|
Subject
|
Groups
|
|
FIRE
|
RHeim
|
Watch
|
|
|
|
|
Â
|
|
|
|
|
AB 319
|
(Nava) Emergencies: tsunami hazard preparedness
and mitigation. (A-06/01/2007Â htmlÂ
pdf)
|
|
Status:06/01/2007-From
committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 31). Read
second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
|
|
Current Location:06/01/2007-A
SECOND READING
|
|
Calendar Events:06/04/07
38 ASM SECOND READING FILE
|
|
Â
|
|
Summary:
|
Existing law provides that the Director of the Office of
Emergency Services is responsible for coordinating the emergency activities
of all state agencies in connection with a state of emergency. This bill
would enact the Tsunami Hazard Preparedness and Mitigation Act of 2007, to
establish the California Tsunami Hazard Preparedness and Mitigation
Steering Committee to guide tsunami hazard preparation activities in the
state, as specified. It would require the Office of Emergency Services, in
conjunction with the steering committee, to establish a statewide tsunami
hazard mitigation program to assist local governments in preparing for,
responding to, and mitigating the effects of tsunamis, as specified. It
would specify that these provisions would be implemented only to the extent
federal funding is made available for that purpose. This bill contains
other related provisions and other existing laws.
|
|
Â
|
|
|
|
Organization
|
Assigned
|
Position
|
Priority
|
Subject
|
Groups
|
|
FIRE
|
RHeim
|
Watch
|
|
|
|
|
Â
|
|
|
|
|
AB 503
|
(Swanson) Public agencies: overtime:
notice. (A-06/01/2007Â htmlÂ
pdf)
|
|
Status:06/01/2007-From
committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 31). Read
second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
|
|
Current Location:06/01/2007-A
SECOND READING
|
|
Calendar Events:06/04/07
57 ASM SECOND READING FILE
|
|
Â
|
|
Summary:
|
Existing law generally regulates the working hours of
public and private employees. Existing law provides that 8 hours
constitutes a day's work, except as specified. This bill would require the
California Research Bureau to conduct a study, to be submitted to the
Legislature by June 30, 2008, on issues related to a requirement that state
and local agencies provide eight hours' written notice to employees who are
required to work overtime. The bill would require the study to address the
impacts of such a requirement on both employers and employees .
|
|
Â
|
|
|
|
Organization
|
Assigned
|
Position
|
Priority
|
Subject
|
Groups
|
|
FIRE
|
RHeim
|
Oppose
|
|
|
|
|
Â
|
|
|
|
|
AB 706
|
(Leno) Fire retardants: toxic effects.
(A-06/01/2007Â htmlÂ
pdf)
|
|
Status:06/01/2007-From
committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 31). Read
second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
|
|
Current Location:06/01/2007-A
SECOND READING
|
|
Calendar Events:06/04/07
187 ASM SECOND READING FILE
|
|
Â
|
|
Summary:
|
Existing law makes various findings related to the
toxicity of certain fire retardants containing chemicals known as
brominated fire retardants (BFRs) and chlorinated fire retardants (CFRs),
and prohibits a person from manufacturing, processing, or distributing a
flame-retardant part of a product containing more than one-tenth of 1% of
prescribed retardants. This bill would revise and extend the findings
relating to fire retardants, and would, commencing January 1, 2010, require
all seating, bedding, and furniture products to comply with certain
requirements, including, but not limited to, the requirement that they not
contain brominated fire retardants or chlorinated fire retardants, as
defined. It would also require the Bureau of Home Furnishings and Thermal
Insulation to enforce these provisions. This bill contains other related
provisions and other existing laws.
|
|
Â
|
|
|
|
Organization
|
Assigned
|
Position
|
Priority
|
Subject
|
Groups
|
|
FIRE
|
RHeim
|
Watch
|
|
|
|
|
Â
|
|
|
|
|
AB 759
|
(Karnette) Fire protection: residential
care facilities for the elderly. (A-06/01/2007Â htmlÂ
pdf)
|
|
Status:06/01/2007-From
committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 31). Read
second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
|
|
Current Location:06/01/2007-A
SECOND READING
|
|
Calendar Events:06/04/07
86 ASM SECOND READING FILE
|
|
Â
|
|
Summary:
|
Existing law establishes the State Fire Marshal within
the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and sets forth its duties,
including, but not limited to, administering provisions relating to
inspection and approval of fire protection measures for health and
community care facilities. This bill would require every residential care
facility for the elderly that is licensed to care for not more than 6
residents, to have an approved, operable automatic fire sprinkler system on
and after July 1, 2011, if they are licensed as of July 1, 2010. The bill
would require every facility for which a license is newly issued on or
after July 1, 2010, to have an approved, operable automatic fire sprinkler
system on and after the date of issuance. The bill would require the State
Fire Marshal to adopt regulations to implement these provisions by January
1, 2009. The bill would also provide that if the facility does not own the
property, the requirements do not apply until July 1, 2012, that the
landlord shall determine all phases of construction, and the facility shall
pay all costs including permit fees, cost of design and construction, and
tenant relocation costs. The bill would require the State Fire Marshal to
convene a subcommittee of the marshal's advisory committee and specify
matters for the subcommittee to study, and would require the subcommittee
to report to various committees in the Legislature by January 1, 2009. By
changing the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated
local program. This bill contains other related provisions and other
existing laws.
|
|
Â
|
|
|
|
Organization
|
Assigned
|
Position
|
Priority
|
Subject
|
Groups
|
|
FIRE
|
RHeim
|
Support
|
|
|
FIRE I.C.: Haberek
|
|
Â
|
|
|
|
|
AB 864
|
(Davis) Substandard buildings: new
ownership interest: registration. (A-06/01/2007Â htmlÂ
pdf)
|
|
Status:06/01/2007-From
committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 31). Read
second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
|
|
Current Location:06/01/2007-A
SECOND READING
|
|
Calendar Events:06/04/07
99 ASM SECOND READING FILE
|
|
Â
|
|
Summary:
|
The State Housing Law regulates buildings used for human
habitation and requires specified local agencies to enforce building
standards. This bill would require a person or entity that acquires an
ownership interest in a property for which an enforcement agency has
recorded with the county recorder any of specified documents relating to
substandard building violations, to provide that enforcement agency with
specified information and documents , signed under penalty of perjury,
concurrently with the completion of an agreement of sale, an exchange of
property, or closure of escrow. The bill would impose a state-mandated
local program by imposing additional duties upon enforcement agencies. This
bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws.
|
|
Â
|
|
|
|
Organization
|
Assigned
|
Position
|
Priority
|
Subject
|
Groups
|
|
FIRE
|
RHeim
|
|
|
|
|
|
Â
|
|
|
|
|
AB 1130
|
(Laird) Aboveground storage tanks.
(A-06/01/2007Â htmlÂ
pdf)
|
|
Status:06/01/2007-From
committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 31). Read
second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
|
|
Current Location:06/01/2007-A
SECOND READING
|
|
Calendar Events:06/04/07
128 ASM SECOND READING FILE
|
|
Â
|
|
Summary:
|
Existing law requires the Secretary for Environmental
Protection to implement a unified hazardous waste and hazardous materials
management regulatory program. A city or local agency that meets specified
requirements is authorized to apply to the secretary to implement the
unified program, and every county is required to apply to the secretary to
be certified to implement the unified program. This bill would instead
require the Unified Program Agency (UPA) to implement that act, and would
make conforming changes. This bill contains other related provisions and
other existing laws.
|
|
Â
|
|
|
|
Organization
|
Assigned
|
Position
|
Priority
|
Subject
|
Groups
|
|
FIRE
|
RHeim
|
Support
|
|
|
|
|
Â
|
|
|
|
|
AB 1170
|
(Krekorian) State mandates.
(A-06/01/2007Â htmlÂ
pdf)
|
|
Status:06/01/2007-From
committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 31). Read
second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
|
|
Current Location:06/01/2007-A
SECOND READING
|
|
Calendar Events:06/04/07
191 ASM SECOND READING FILE
|
|
Â
|
|
Summary:
|
Under the California Constitution, whenever the
Legislature or a state agency mandates a new program or higher level of
service on any local government, including school districts, the state is
required to provide a subvention of funds to reimburse the local
government, with specified exceptions. Existing law establishes a procedure
for local governmental agencies to file claims for reimbursement of these
costs with the Commission on State Mandates. Under this procedure, the
commission is required to hear and decide upon each claim for reimbursement
and then determine the amount to be subvened for reimbursement, which the
Controller shall pay to eligible claimants. The procedure also provides
that a reimbursement claim for actual costs filed by a local agency or
school district is subject to an audit by the Controller no later than 3
years after the date that the actual reimbursement claim is filed or last
amended, whichever is later, but that, if no funds are appropriated or no
payment is made to a claimant for the fiscal year for which the claim is filed,
the audit shall be commenced no later than 3 years from the date of the
initial payment of the claim. This bill would require the commission to
issue a decision upon a local agency or school district test claim no later
than 36 months after the date the claim is filed if the claim was filed on
or after January 1, 2009, and no later than December 31, 2013 . It also
would , with respect to a reimbursement claim that is filed or last amended
on or after January 1, 2009, and no later than December 31, 2013, delete
the provision that authorizes the Controller to commence an audit no later
than 3 years from the date of the initial payment of the claim if certain
conditions exist.
|
|
Â
|
|
|
|
Organization
|
Assigned
|
Position
|
Priority
|
Subject
|
Groups
|
|
FIRE
|
RHeim
|
|
|
|
|
|
Â
|
|
|
|
|
AB 1239
|
(Garrick) Property taxation: exclusion
from newly constructed: fire safety devices.
(A-06/01/2007Â htmlÂ
pdf)
|
|
Status:06/01/2007-From
committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 31). Read
second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
|
|
Current Location:06/01/2007-A
SECOND READING
|
|
Calendar Events:06/04/07
192 ASM SECOND READING FILE
|
|
Â
|
|
Summary:
|
The California Constitution generally limits ad valorem
taxes on real property to 1% of the full cash value of that property. For
purposes of this limitation, "full cash value" is defined as the
assessor's valuation of real property as shown on the 1975-76 tax bill
under "full cash value" or, thereafter, the appraised value of
that real property when purchased, newly constructed, or a change in
ownership has occurred. The California Constitution authorizes the
Legislature to exclude from classification as "newly constructed"
the construction or installation on or after November 7, 1984, of any fire
sprinkler system, other fire extinguishing system, fire detection system,
or fire-related egress improvement, as defined by the Legislature. Existing
property tax law implementing this exclusion provides that the exclusion
only applies to the construction or installation of these items in an
existing building. This bill would provide that this exclusion from
"newly constructed" also applies to the construction or
installation, on and after the operative date of the bill, of any fire
sprinkler system, other fire extinguishing system, or fire detection system
in a new building. This bill would also specify, for purposes of this
exclusion, that "the construction or installation of any fire
sprinkler system, other fire extinguishing system, or fire detection
system" includes the construction of any fire sprinkler system, other
fire extinguishing system, or fire detection system in a new building in
which the owner-builder incorporated the fire sprinkler system, other fire
extinguishing system, or fire detection system in the initial construction
of the building and the owner-builder does not intend to occupy or use the
building. This bill would provide this exclusion to the initial purchaser
of the new building, but only if the owner-builder did not receive an
exclusion for the same system. In the case of a new nonresidential
building, this bill would specify that "fire sprinkler system, other
fire extinguishing system, or fire detection system" does not include
such items that are required by law to be included in the new building.
This bill would require the county assessor to reduce the base-year value
of these buildings by the value of such items, as specified. This bill
would require the State Board of Equalization , in consultation with the
California Assessor's Association, to prescribe the manner and form for a
taxpayer to claim this exclusion. This bill contains other related
provisions and other existing laws.
|
|
Â
|
|
|
|
Organization
|
Assigned
|
Position
|
Priority
|
Subject
|
Groups
|
|
FIRE
|
RHeim
|
Support
|
|
|
|
|
Â
|
|